ON-DEMAND
This event is now available on-demand. If you have previously registered for this event please click here and login using the email that you used to register.
Live Webcast Date: Tuesday, April 26, 2022
Cost: Complimentary
Sponsored by:
Join ALM's upcoming webcast and be among the first to take a deep dive into the exclusive insights and trends revealed in our Am Law 100 data on the record-breaking year many firms experienced in 2021 and how they are leveraging that success for 2022. Hear from the editorial and intelligence teams behind the report on the day it's released. You don't want to miss this opportunity, so sign up today!
Law firms have ridden the uncertainty of the past two years to unprecedented success. The experiences weren't universal, however, and market dynamics are starting to shift. In this webcast, we will explore how different segments of the market performed and which firms are best positioned to weather any upcoming changes to market dynamics.
Attendees will have the opportunity to ask our editors and analysts questions about these insights and learn steps to take to be more successful. Save your spot for this webcast and walk away with:
- What drove the tremendous revenue and profit growth of 2021 and what does demand look like for 2022
- How are firms able to use this flood of cash under current law firm structures and how are partners preparing if future years don't match this growth
- What have the fierce talent wars meant for firms' position in the market, interest in geographic expansion and focus on culture
- Exclusive data coupled with research and editorial analysis that can't be obtained anywhere else
For Law Firm Partners: Find out where your firm and your competitors rank. Understand the key trends underlying the data and what segments of the market are performing the strongest. Hear the stories behind the averages, what this data reveals about the health of the industry and its biggest players. And highlights of what we might see in the Am Law Second Hundred.
For Law Firm Marketing Professionals: Find out where your firm and competitors rank, which types of firms and strategies are succeeding and what the data indicates for the coming years.
For Legal HR Professionals: Understand compensation trends to inform hiring practices. Learn how and where firms are expanding or contracting by attorney type.
For Consultants/Legaltech Vendors: Pinpoint key prospects. Learn what firms are growing and what trends are driving growth. Learn how firms are staffing and evolving.
Can't attend? You should still register! We'll be sending out an on-demand recording after the webcast so you can participate when it's convenient for you.
Speakers:
Patrick Fuller | VP of Legal | ALM Intelligence
Gina Passarella | Editor-in-Chief | The American Lawyer
Ben Seal | Executive Editor | The American Lawyer
Jae Um | Founder and Executive Director | Six Parsecs
James Willer | Sr. Analyst | ALM Intelligence
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
5 minute read
Beyond the finish line: Why the real race begins with CLM Post-Implementation Support
4 minute read
Emerging Technologies and Best Practices for Data Governance in Law Firms
2 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Dechert partners Andrew J. Levander, Angela M. Liu and Neil A. Steiner have stepped in to defend Arbor Realty Trust and certain executives in a pending securities class action. The complaint, filed July 31 in New York Eastern District Court by Levi & Korsinsky, contends that the defendants concealed a 'toxic' mobile home portfolio, vastly overstated collateral in regards to the company's loans and failed to disclose an investigation of the company by the FBI. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Pamela K. Chen, is 1:24-cv-05347, Martin v. Arbor Realty Trust, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Arthur G. Jakoby, Ryan Feeney and Maxim M.L. Nowak from Herrick Feinstein have stepped in to defend Charles Dilluvio and Seacor Capital in a pending securities lawsuit. The complaint, filed Sept. 30 in New York Southern District Court by the Securities and Exchange Commission, accuses the defendants of using consulting agreements, attorney opinion letters and other mechanisms to skirt regulations limiting stock sales by affiliate companies and allowing the defendants to unlawfully profit from sales of Enzolytics stock. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Andrew L. Carter Jr., is 1:24-cv-07362, Securities and Exchange Commission v. Zhabilov et al.
Who Got The Work
Clark Hill members Vincent Roskovensky and Kevin B. Watson have entered appearances for Architectural Steel and Associated Products in a pending environmental lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Eastern District Court by Brodsky & Smith on behalf of Hung Trinh, accuses the defendant of discharging polluted stormwater from its steel facility without a permit in violation of the Clean Water Act. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Gerald J. Pappert, is 2:24-cv-04490, Trinh v. Architectural Steel And Associated Products, Inc.
Who Got The Work
Michael R. Yellin of Cole Schotz has entered an appearance for S2 d/b/a the Shoe Surgeon, Dominic Chambrone a/k/a Dominic Ciambrone and other defendants in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The case, filed July 15 in New York Southern District Court by DLA Piper on behalf of Nike, seeks to enjoin Ciambrone and the other defendants in their attempts to build an 'entire multifaceted' retail empire through their unauthorized use of Nike’s trademark rights. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, is 1:24-cv-05307, Nike Inc. v. S2, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Sullivan & Cromwell partner Adam S. Paris has entered an appearance for Orthofix Medical in a pending securities class action arising from a proposed acquisition of SeaSpine by Orthofix. The suit, filed Sept. 6 in California Southern District Court, by Girard Sharp and the Hall Firm, contends that the offering materials and related oral communications contained untrue statements of material fact. According to the complaint, the defendants made a series of misrepresentations about Orthofix’s disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting and ethical compliance. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Linda Lopez, is 3:24-cv-01593, O'Hara v. Orthofix Medical Inc. et al.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250
