“In many instances, the questions were irrelevant, vicious and intended to provoke her into giving an in-kind response that would be viewed as a self-fulfilling prophecy,” Patricia A. Broussard, professor of law at Florida A&M University College of Law, said in an email to Law.com on Friday.
March 25, 2022 at 07:05 PM
7 minute read
U.S. Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson faced a harrowing litany of questions from the Senate Judiciary Committee this week involving issues that included criminal defense, sentencing, abortion and recusals.
Legal academics from across the country spoke to Law.com on Friday, weighing in with their analysis of the hearing, which concluded Thursday.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee during the second day of her confirmation hearing to become an associate justice of the U.S. Supreme Court on March 22, 2022. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
