The Arizona Supreme Court, citing its own 2020 ruling in Clements v. Bernini ex. rel. County of Pima, has remanded a case to the trial court to determine if a criminal defendant can assert attorney-client privilege on a broad scale when some communications may have been inadvertently disclosed.

The Supreme Court released its opinion Wednesday in State v. Beasley, which examines the application of attorney-client privilege when communications are purportedly disclosed inadvertently. The court considered whether a defendant in a criminal case who asserts attorney-client privilege must make a prima facie showing that each communication is privileged or if the court can rely on “a blanket application of the privilege,” Justice John R. Lopez IV wrote on behalf of the court.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]