'I Win, No Matter What,' Attorney Says During Oral Argument Centered on Rules of Evidence
"The state never objected to the [trial] court's finding that everything after 1 minute 13 seconds was testimonial. The state never cross appealed," argued Atlanta litigator W. Scott Smith. "This court is hamstrung because the parameters are set."
December 10, 2021 at 12:03 PM
5 minute read
Civil AppealsThe original version of this story was published on Daily Report
In its second-to-last oral argument of the year, the Georgia Court of Appeals heard arguments pitting due process against the rules of evidence, in a case in which the state revoked a convict's probation without providing him an opportunity to confront his accusers.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Trending Stories
- 1First Lawsuit Filed Alleging Contraceptive Depo-Provera Caused Brain Tumor
- 2BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 3The Law Firm Disrupted: For Big Law Names, Shorter is Sweeter
- 4The Growing Tension—And Opportunity—in Big Law Nonequity Tiers
- 5The 'Biden Effect' on Senior Attorneys: Should I Stay or Should I Go?
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250