"Although the client posted the review anonymously, Draskovich posted a response in which he did not merely disagree with the client's assessment of his work," the justices continued, "but instead disclosed the client's name, case number, specific facts about the criminal charges against the client, and numerous details related to his representation of the client."
December 02, 2021 at 04:58 PM
3 minute read
An attorney who replied to a client’s negative review of him on the online legal directory Avvo.com with the client’s personal information and case details has been cited with a public reprimand.
By order of the Supreme Court of Nevada, attorney Robert Draskovich must also pay court costs for disciplinary proceedings and a $1,500 fine, in addition to the public reprimand.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
