'The Phone Has Been Ringing': As Number of Astroworld Lawsuits Escalates, So Do Litigators' Concerns
With the rising number of suits comes a panoply of different law firms and a question of whether consolidation may be the ultimate—and most practical—course of litigation.
November 09, 2021 at 02:59 PM
4 minute read
Personal InjuryThe original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Rapper Travis Scott and concert promoter Live Nation are being targeted by a growing number lawsuits following the events of the 2021 Astroworld Festival in Houston that left eight people dead and dozens more injured. The growing stack of complaints against Scott—whose real name is Jacques Webster II—Live Nation and NRG Park generally allege that the defendants created unsafe conditions exacerbating the damage caused by the crowd panic. But with the rising number of suits comes a panoply of different law firms and a question of whether consolidation may be the ultimate—and most practical—course of litigation. Sean Roberts of Roberts Markland in Houston said the firm represents 45 plaintiffs in the Astroworld litigation, which he said is likely to encompass at least 100 lawsuits. Live Nation did not respond to a request for comment. "The phone has been ringing," Roberts said. Regarding consolidation, Roberts said, "It is likely just because of the number of suits. It is highly probably that there is one judge who is going to manage this docket. We just don't know who that is going to be right now. Assuming that at least one of these cases by today has landed in one of the Harris County judges' court." There are also lawsuits likely to be filed in surrounding counties as well. But the biggest challenge, according to Roberts, isn't how the litigation will be organized. "The biggest challenge I see is if there is a lack of adequate insurance. If Live Nation does not have at least $1 billion in insurance coverage, it's going to get interesting." He added by way of comparison that in the litigation stemming from BP Texas City refinery explosion in 2005 that killed 15, BP paid out over $1.5 billion. "Another example is the MGM shooting case where MGM settled for $800 million," Roberts said. "The thing I think most of us are trying to determine is whether Live Nation was as lax with buying insurance as they were with setting up security." Veteran personal injury lawyer Robert Mongeluzzi of Saltz Mongeluzzi & Bendesky in Philadelphia, though not involved in the Astroworld litigation, has sued Live Nation for crowd surge injuries that occurred during a Snoop Dogg concert at BB&T Pavilion in Camden, New Jersey. In that case, Live Nation was sued when a rail system on one of the stages collapsed, injuring concert-goers. Like Astroworld, Mongeluzzi said the BB&T Pavilion incident was standing-room only. "When we're in a normal concert with seating and aisle, crowd surge is not an issue: Once you go to a standing-room only, you now lose all the safety protection of having thick seating and aisles," Mongeluzzi said. He added that by using a standing-room only, Live Nation was trying to maximize profit. "Standing-room only is a much more profitable enterprise for the concert promotors and the enterprise because you can fit a hell of a lot more people. But with that you lose any semblance of being able to control a crowd unless you have an extremely large and well-trained security because there's no choke point, no aisles. Particularly with artists whose style will cause people to be much more aggressive in moving forward" toward the stage. Mongeluzzi continued, "It is clear they did not have that at Astroworld. Having experience in this realm, if I was handling this case I'd argue you [Live Nation] made the decision not to have seats, you made the decision to not have aisles, you made the decision to have 'SRO,' what did you do about security? What did you do about communication with the artist? It's clear they were unaware of what was going on or reacted extremely late to it." Mongeluzzi added, "The only thing that seems pretty robust was the steel fence protecting the artist form the crowd, but unfortunately not the safety of the concert-goers and they're the ones who paid the price with their lives."
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All'Farcical': US Judge Threatens Rudy Giuliani With Contempt Over Lack of Asset Disclosure
Judge Relies on Recent 8th Circuit Clarification in Quest for Punitive Damages Against Logistics Company
5 minute readJudge Orders Rudy Giuliani to Court Amid Allegations He's Hiding Assets Under Receivership
'A Complete Sideshow': Judge Mutes Giuliani, Denies Sanctions in $10 Million Sex Abuse Litigation
Trending Stories
- 1Trump's Return to the White House: The Legal Industry Reacts
- 2Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 3Climate Disputes, International Arbitration, and State Court Limitations for Global Issues
- 4Election 2024: Nationwide Judicial Races and Ballot Measures to Watch
- 5Judicial Face-Off: Navigating the Ethical and Efficient Use of AI in Legal Practice [CLE Pending]
- 6How Much Does the Frequency of Retirement Withdrawals Matter?
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250