Apple Inc. and its law firm got more grief Wednesday for raising a laundry list of appellate issues in their attack on a $1.1 billion patent infringement verdict for the California Institute of Technology.
Apple and co-appellant Broadcom Ltd. argue there was no infringement, that one of the patents is ineligible for protection, that U.S. District Judge George Wu in Los Angeles erred on claim construction, that Caltech’s damages theory was faulty, and that Apple and Broadcom were wrongly estopped from raising invalidity defenses.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]