A California trial judge has cleared the way for a landmark malpractice lawsuit against Katten Muchin Rosenman, rejecting a defense request to apply a Washington, D.C., law that could have gutted the plaintiff’s claims for nearly $1 billion in damages.
The order Friday from Orange County Superior Court Judge William D. Claster reverses a June 10 tentative ruling in Katten’s favor, with the judge saying he initially “failed to correctly analyze where the alleged wrongful conduct occurred and then apply the governmental interest test in light of that revised analysis.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]