After a morning considering the First Amendment rights of a junior varsity cheerleader cut from her team over a profane social media post, the U.S. Supreme Court picked up PennEast Pipeline v. New Jersey at noon Wednesday.
The high court turned on a dime from Snapchat to sovereignty of the federal government, from in-school speech to in rem actions—those pertaining to things instead of people—from rights of passage to rights of condemnation, from teens to the takings clause, from the Fifth Amendment right to just compensation for seizure of private property.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]