Special Report

Litigation: Editor's Picks

Our global newsroom covers litigation at every level, from bet-the-company cases involving multinational litigants to local personal injury lawsuits with statewide implications. Here you'll find the best of our litigation trend analysis and in-depth commentary from practitioners and judges, along with our coverage of key players, breaking news, game-changing rulings, major recoveries and international cases.

X

Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
John M. Baker and Katherine M. Swenson John M. Baker and Katherine M. Swenson

In Luer v. Clinton, 987 F.3d 1160 (8th Cir. 2021), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that officers’ nighttime entry into a residence’s backyard, the residence’s attached garage, and the residence itself—all in search of a suspect who failed to pay a cab fare—were justified by the “community caretaker” exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement. But the officers’ “extensive search” of the residence was held to be objectively unreasonable, depriving them of qualified immunity. With the U.S. Supreme Court taking up this term the parameters of any “community caretaking” exception to general Fourth Amendment requirements for home entries and searches, it is possible this precedent may be short-lived.

In the wee hours on morning in 2016, two police officers in St. Louis County, Missouri, responded to a call from a taxi driver whose inebriated passenger had left the taxi, claiming he was going to retrieve money to pay the $65 fare, and ran away into the suburban neighborhood. The taxi driver called police at 2:38 a.m., and the officers arrived less than 10 minutes later. The driver provided a description of the suspect and pointed in the direction he had fled. One officer went in that direction—between a house owned by the plaintiffs and a neighboring residence. The officer entered and searched the neighboring backyard. Finding no one, the officer entered the plaintiffs’ backyard. While walking on the side of plaintiffs’ house, the officer saw that a service door to the garage (not visible from the street) was “not fully secured.”[1]

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 1 article* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Defending Federal Criminal Cases: Attacking the Government's ProofBook

Equips defense attorneys with the legal arguments and tactics they can and should use to challenge the government's evidence at every stage of a criminal case.

Get More Information
 

The British Legal Awards 2021Event

Celebrating achievement, excellence, and innovation in the legal profession in the UK.

Get More Information
 

The American Lawyer Industry Awards 2021Event

Honoring outstanding legal achievements focused at the national level, largely around Big Law and in-house departments.

Get More Information
 
 

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2021 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.