According to several members of Philadelphia’s trial bar, the overwhelming feeling they had watching one of their own represent former President Donald Trump during his recent impeachment was “embarrassment.”

Not necessarily because of the performance that Michael van der Veen delivered last week in securing an acquittal in the U.S. Senate for Trump. But rather, they said, they were upset that a prominent member of their ranks was delivering a fiery defense of a president who for four years seemed to have pushed policies, and expressed views on the rule of law, that were diametrically opposed to everything the local bar stands for.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]