"What plaintiff is attempting to do is 'piggyback' an otherwise inadmissible backward-looking statement onto an admissible statement," the ruling said.
February 11, 2021 at 02:30 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Daily Business Review
A $10.6 million jury verdict against R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. is no more after the Fourth District Court of Appeal found that award had stemmed from hearsay.
The ruling, issued Wednesday, centered around an objection to three words: “from the advertising,” which proved enough to undo the plaintiff’s case and send it back to trial.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Judge Dorian K. Damoorgian wrote the ruling. Photo: Melanie Bell/ALM.
