The implications of these court cases stretch beyond COVID, as they could come to bear during future pandemics and even potentially impact claims stemming from environmental hazards or climate change.
(Credit: ErgoSum88/Wiki Commons)
With two federal courts in the state handing down divergent rulings on whether COVID-19 would constitute a physical loss for business interruption (BI) claims, Ohio is the center for these cases, with judges around the country watching to see which side prevails during appeals.
Want to continue reading?
Become a Free PropertyCasualty360 Digital Reader
Your access to unlimited PropertyCasualty360 content isn’t changing.
Once you are an ALM digital member, you’ll receive:
- All PropertyCasualty360.com news coverage, best practices, and in-depth analysis.
- Educational webcasts, resources from industry leaders, and informative newsletters.
- Other award-winning websites including BenefitsPRO.com and ThinkAdvisor.com.
Already have an account? Sign In
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
Steve Hallo
Steve Hallo is managing editor of PropertyCasualty360.com. He can be reached at [email protected]
