A ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit provides a glimpse into the sharply divided appeals court, and presents a call to action to address the court’s “systemic” habit of overstepping its authority in some death penalty cases.

Fourteen 9th Circuit judges joined a dissent to a Monday ruling denying an en banc rehearing of a death penalty case. However, both a dissent and concurrence to the decision crossed party lines.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]