On Monday, legal research platform ROSS filed a counterclaim arguing that Westlaw’s legal research dominance is fueled by Thomson Reuters’ alleged anticompetitive tactics. The filing was in response to Thomson Reuter’s lawsuit lodged in May that accused ROSS of scraping Westlaw’s proprietary data for content.

ROSS alleged in its filing that Westlaw’s status as “king of legal search” was a product of “exclusionary and [an] anticompetitive course of conduct to maintain its monopoly and restrain trade.” ROSS wrote it would show Westlaw “used anticompetitive sales and licensing regimes supported by a web of sham copyrights and intimidation tactics to crush potential rivals like ROSS.”

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]