Fueled with $75 million in venture capital, Atrium was a high-profile effort to apply the lessons of Silicon Valley to the legal industry. Then serial tech entrepreneur Justin Kan pulled the plug. Nearly a year later, he revisited some of his missteps. Want to weigh in? Email me here. Want this dispatch in your inbox every Thursday? Sign up here.

What Went Wrong at Atrium?

I spent part of my holiday break reading Anna Wiener’s Uncanny Valley. It’s a terrific book, particularly for those curious about the tech industry’s desire to muscle in on other established sectors of the economy, from retail to transportation to medicine to the law. The deftness with which Wiener punctures the hubris of the 20-something startup founders who believe they’ve found a better way to do, well, pretty much everything, made me self-conscious about the title of this briefing. (But I haven’t talked to anyone about changing it.)

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]