In what is believed to be a first-impression decision in the contempt-of-court context, a Kings County Supreme Court justice has ruled against a husband in a contentious divorce case, who faces a possible criminal contempt finding over spoliation of evidence, who’d demanded an in-person hearing and an indefinite postponement of it based on COVID-19 health concerns.
The husband, referred to as only C.C. in the judge’s decision, and his lawyer Maria Coffinas had argued vigorously that given the possible imprisonment stakes of the contempt of court faced by C.C., an in-person proceeding had to be granted, according to the decision denying C.C.’s motion issued by Justice Jeffrey Sunshine.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]