State appellate justices on Tuesday pushed back on arguments by Uber and Lyft that a trial court judge abused his discretion by issuing a preliminary injunction—now stayed—forcing the ride-hailing companies to classify their drivers as employees.

During an online hearing, Associate Justice Jon Streeter of the First District Court of Appeal said the companies never responded to San Francisco Superior Court Judge Ethan Schulman’s questions about what a narrow injunction—perhaps one that only affected frequent drivers—might look like.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]