A Federal Circuit majority says a jury verdict of patent infringement must be respected, but Chief Judge Sharon Prost says her colleagues are helping GlaxoSmithKline unfairly extend a $7.1 billion monopoly on an anti-hypertensive medicine.
October 02, 2020 at 08:18 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
The chief judge of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has gone to war with two of her colleagues over pharmaceutical patents and high drug prices.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
The Legal Intelligencer honors lawyers leaving a mark on the legal community in Pennsylvania and Delaware.
A large and well-established Tampa company is seeking a contracts administrator to support the company's in-house attorney and manage a wide...
We are seeking an attorney to join our commercial finance practice in either our Stamford, Hartford or New Haven offices. Candidates should ...
We are seeking an attorney to join our corporate and transactional practice. Candidates should have a minimum of 8 years of general corporat...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
Chief Judge Sharon Prost and Judge Pauline Newman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. (Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM)
