Want to get this daily news briefing by email? Here’s the sign-up.


SHOW-ME THE MONEY –  Earlier this week, in our Law.com Trendspotter column we looked at how business interruption litigation against insurers, while white-hot right now in terms of the amount being filed, has so far been met with a healthy dose of skepticism by judges and practitioners alike. But we also mentioned a recent ruling by the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri that handed plaintiffs attorneys a much-needed, if preliminary, win. The court, rejecting a motion to dismiss, ruled that a group of hair salons and restaurants could sue their insurer for business interruption losses caused by the pandemic, which they say resulted in a “direct physical loss” to their premises. Katheryn Tucker checked in with trial lawyers about why the ruling out of the Show-Me State has “energized” the national plaintiffs bar and how it could potentially help in similar cases around the country.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]