Thank you for sharing!

Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided.
Judge Thomas Griffith, of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM

The en banc ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit that lawmakers aren’t blocked from going to court over subpoenas against the Trump administration was a win for the House. But a dissenting judge in the case warned of a “Pyrrhic victory” for lawmakers, pointing to prolonged delays in the litigation that will likely prevent them from obtaining the information at the heart of the cases any time soon.

Want to continue reading?
Become a Free ALM Digital Reader.

Benefits of a Digital Membership:

  • Free access to 3 articles* every 30 days
  • Access to the entire ALM network of websites
  • Unlimited access to the ALM suite of newsletters
  • Build custom alerts on any search topic of your choosing
  • Search by a wide range of topics

*May exclude premium content
Already have an account?

Jacqueline Thomsen

Jacqueline Thomsen, based in Washington, is a reporter covering D.C. federal courts and the legal side of politics. Contact her at [email protected] and follow her on Twitter @jacq_thomsen.

More from this author


Federal False Claims Act and Qui Tam LitigationBook

This legal treatise covers the merits of a potential action, determining whether the relator would be barred or restricted from any recovery for retaliation and analysis ...

Get More Information

ALM Legal Publication Newsletters

Sign Up Today and Never Miss Another Story.

As part of your digital membership, you can sign up for an unlimited number of a wide range of complimentary newsletters. Visit your My Account page to make your selections. Get the timely legal news and critical analysis you cannot afford to miss. Tailored just for you. In your inbox. Every day.

Copyright © 2020 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All Rights Reserved.