The legal business world in many ways is one of a rotating set of buzzwords. Practice areas are cleverly named, director and leader titles are pointedly given, and strategy shifts are regularly framed in “innovative” and “cutting-edge” terms. But sometimes, what results is confusion about what a term actually means—when everybody has a different definition of a term for their own purposes, that term loses some of its meaning.
Perhaps that is already occurring for the idea of “New Law.” Looking to find a separate nomenclature from “alternative legal services providers” (ALSPs), many companies, startups and law firm subsidiaries augmenting traditional legal services have adopted the New Law label as a way to promote innovation. The designation is meant to convey the idea that law is conducted through a new and exciting path, though the practical detail of where exactly that pathway leads differs from company to company. That’s why, for some, New Law is a term that’s hard to define.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.
For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]