Federal Judge Nixes $30M Attorney Fee Award in Yahoo Data Breach Settlement
U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh said that she is "convinced that the size of the settlement fund is largely a function of the size of the settlement class, and 'not entirely attributable to class counsel's skill'" in an order Tuesday granting final approval of a class action settlement over Yahoo data breaches.
July 21, 2020 at 08:27 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The Recorder
A federal judge has granted final approval in a $117.5 million class action settlement over Yahoo Inc.'s data breaches but found that class counsel's $30 million fee request was too high.
U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh of the Northern District of California issued the order Tuesday in the litigation dating back to 2016.
The settlement class encompasses roughly 194 million people whose personal information might have been compromised through their Yahoo accounts in several data breaches over the course of five years. The average payout per class member comes out to about 60 cents, according to the ruling.
Koh disagreed with plaintiffs' attorneys that the percentage-of-recovery method is the best way to determine attorney's fees in the case. "Instead, having overseen this case for four years, the court finds that justice would be best served by applying the lodestar method—i.e., tying the fee awards for class counsel to the actual hours they reasonably expended on this litigation and then selecting a multiplier," she wrote.
Koh compared the per-capita recovery for class members in the settlement to the $1.46 earned per class member in the Anthem data breach litigation, which she also oversaw. "Here, by contrast, the per-capita recovery is roughly $0.60 per settlement class member," she said. "In light of this disparity, the court is therefore convinced that the size of the settlement fund is largely a function of the size of the settlement class, and 'not entirely attributable to class counsel's skill.'"
As part of the settlement, Yahoo will also funnel $66 million per year into its information security budget until 2022, which is four times more that it spent on average from 2013 to 2016, according to the ruling. The company has also agreed to hire 200 full-time information security employees through 2022, compared with the 48 it employed the year the lawsuit was filed.
"These non-monetary forms of relief benefit millions of settlement class members, including those who do not submit a claim form," Koh wrote. "The court finds that this nonmonetary relief weighs in favor of final approval."
The ruling was not the first time Koh voiced concerns about attorney fees in the case. In June, Koh asked plaintiffs lawyers to provide more billing details, saying that she would not award attorney's fees without getting one document laying out the total number of billers by firm and position.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllState Appellate Court Affirms $2.75M Jury Verdict in Negligence Suit Against Railroad Co.
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: The Recorder and Law.com's California Legal Awards 2025
- 2The Week in Data Dec. 13: A Look at Legal Industry Trends by the Numbers
- 3Antitrust Class Actions Against CVS, Other Pharmacy Benefit Managers Are Piling Up
- 4Judge Grinds NY's Cannabis Licensing Regime to a Halt Again
- 5On the Move and After Hours: Barclay Damon; VLJ; Barnes & Thornburg
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250