Hughes Hubbard Lays Off Attorneys and Staff After Receiving PPP Loan
The firm received between $5 million-$10 million from the SBA in April to save more than 400 jobs.
July 07, 2020 at 03:51 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Hughes Hubbard & Reed—an AmLaw 200 firm that received a multimillion-dollar paycheck protection loan from the Small Business Administration—has laid off an undisclosed number of its attorneys and staff, according to firm statements Tuesday.
The New York-based firm confirmed the layoffs to Above the Law, which reported that associates were affected. The firm said in a separate statement to Law.com that the PPP loan money was used for its intended purpose, "to save jobs during the worst of the crisis." But now more than three months later, the firm said, it felt the "deep impact" from court closures and a slowdown in deal activity, and the firm made "difficult decisions on staffing to address the current environment."
Firm chair Ted Mayer declined to comment further Tuesday afternoon, and the firm declined to disclose how many attorneys and staff members were affected by layoffs. According to Above the Law, which pointed to a lack of work triggering layoffs, Hughes Hubbard is offering affected associates three months severance pay as well as five complimentary sessions with a legal recruiter to find a new job.
Hughes Hubbard's attorney head count was 248 in 2019, including 138 associates, according to NLJ 500 data.
Hughes Hubbard is among the dozens of Am Law 200 firms that received PPP loans from the SBA, after Congress in March earmarked $350 billion in funding as business loans as the coronavirus pandemic caused economic turmoil in the U.S. and beyond. The firm on April 15 received between $5 million to $10 million from CitiBank and said in its application the money would preserve 442 jobs, according to the SBA data.
"We decided in the early stage of the pandemic to keep our entire team intact for as long as we could, hopeful for a swift economic recovery," the firm said in a statement Tuesday. "We were one of the more than 100 firms that decided in the early stage of the pandemic to apply for the PPP and were approved based on the SBA criteria. That money was used for its intended purpose, to save jobs during the worst of the crisis."
"Now more than three months into the pandemic, the deep impact of court closures and a slowdown in deal activity have given us a better-informed sense of the manner in which the pandemic has changed the way we do business. We, like other firms, have made some difficult decisions on staffing to address the current environment," the firm's statement continued. "We regret the hardship these steps cause as we, and the industry, evolve to meet this changing environment. We have confidence that the action we take today will enable us to serve our clients, to compete at the highest level and to deploy our people effectively."
The Hughes Hubbard layoffs come months after much of the legal industry responded to the pandemic in the first and second quarter with pay cuts, furloughs, layoffs and other austerity measures. At the time, Hughes Hubbard resisted cost-cutting measures.
The firm's gross revenue and head count have been trending downward since 2013, when it brought in a record $396 million and employed 351 lawyers, ranking No. 72 on the 2014 Am Law 200. It fell off the Am Law 100 rankings in 2017. Last year, the firm's gross revenue dropped by 5.7% to $288.1 million.
|Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFactSet Finds New Legal Chief at Financial Data Rival S&P
Freshfields Hires SEC Associate Director in Latest D.C. Lateral Hiring Spree
4 minute readFormer Cahill Executive Committee Member, Leveraged Finance Pioneer Dies at 67
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250