Relying on reasoning underpinning a high-profile Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision from last year, a judge in northeastern Pennsylvania has invalidated an insurance policy’s regular use exclusion.

Northampton County Court of Common Pleas Judge Stephen Baratta late last month determined that Erie Insurance Exchange’s policy barring coverage for injuries that occurred in vehicles the insured regularly used but did not own went against the Supreme Court’s rationale in Gallagher v. Geico, which restricted insurance companies from using the household exclusion to decline stacking coverage. At the time some insurance litigators said Gallagher would have “seismic” impacts on the insurance industry.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]