A Missouri appeals court has sliced a $4.7 billion talcum powder verdict to $2.1 billion but refused to wipe out punitive damages, concluding that the evidence at trial showed Johnson & Johnson’s conduct was “outrageous because of evil motive or reckless indifference.”

In a Tuesday order, the Missouri Court of Appeals sided with Johnson & Johnson in reversing the jury award entirely as to two of the 22 women and their families who alleged that prolonged use of its baby powder, which contained asbestos, caused them to get ovarian cancer. The unanimous panel, which heard oral arguments earlier this year, also reversed the awards against Johnson & Johnson as to another 15 women who used Shower to Shower, another talcum powder product, because they were not from Missouri and, as such, lacked personal jurisdiction to bring their claims in St. Louis City Circuit Court.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]