Where the Trump Campaign is Spending Its Legal Consulting Cash
The bulk of the campaign's April legal spending went to Harder LLP, a firm that has threatened and sued media companies on Trump's behalf.
May 21, 2020 at 03:23 PM
4 minute read
President Donald Trump's reelection campaign shelled out more than $500,000 on legal fees last month, spending half of that amount on a boutique law office suing media companies on his behalf and almost $200,000 on Jones Day, the firm of former White House counsel Donald McGahn.
Trump's campaign also directed a relatively meager sum, nearly $6,500, to Consovoy McCarthy, a firm that has defended the president in lawsuits seeking access to his financial records, according to a disclosure filed Wednesday. With that payment last month, the campaign's total spending on Consovoy McCarthy came to nearly $200,000 since October 2019.
The bulk of the campaign's April legal spending went to Harder LLP, a firm that has threatened and sued media companies.
Trump turned to the firm's name partner, Charles Harder, in March for a libel suit against CNN over an opinion piece that said the president's campaign had left open the possibility of seeking Russia's assistance in the 2020 election. Harder is involved in Trump suits against The New York Times and Washington Post for alleged libel, citing opinion pieces that linked Trump to Russia's interference in the 2016 election. In March, the Trump campaign paid Harder's firm more than $450,000, about half of its $900,000 in legal spending that month. Since 2018, the Trump campaign has paid Harder's firm more than $3 million, disclosures show.
Meanwhile, Trump's campaign money continued to flow to Jones Day, the law firm that has long advised the president in connection with his political ambitions. Since 2015, Trump's campaign has spent more than $11 million on the firm, which has fed numerous former partners into high-ranking posts in the administration and, in some cases, seats on the federal bench.
The dip in legal spending, from $900,000 in March to about $550,000 in April, coincided with a plummeting of campaign expenditures overall by Trump and his presumptive Democratic challenger, former Vice President Joe Biden, as the coronavirus outbreak kept both of them off the trail. Trump's campaign spent $7.7 million and Biden's shelled out nearly $13 million, marking the lowest monthly outlays of the year.
Biden's campaign devoted almost $100,000 to legal services in April, with more than $85,000 spent on Covington & Burling. The campaign hired Covington partner Robert Lenhard, a former chairman of the Federal Election Commission, last year and has since paid the firm almost $1 million, according to a review of disclosures.
In 2008, the year he joined Covington, Lenhard oversaw the Obama transition team that reviewed the FEC for the incoming Democratic administration.
The new campaign finance disclosures also showed that, a month after ending his presidential bid, billionaire Michael Bloomberg paid Venable nearly $1 million in April. Venable is representing Bloomberg in a case filed by former campaign field organizers.
Bloomberg, the former mayor of New York City, spent another $255,000 on legal consulting from Willkie Farr & Gallagher that month, according to his campaign's latest financial disclosure.
|Read more:
Consovoy McCarthy, Hiring Utah's Solicitor, Is Now Home to 5 Ex-SCOTUS Clerks
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFirst Came the SEC, Now Investors Raise Allegations Against Acadia Healthcare
4 minute readState Appellate Court Denies Hospital's Request to Move Med Mal Suit From Chicago
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 3Mass. Judge Declares Mistrial in Talc Trial: 'Court Can't Accommodate This Case'
- 4It's Time Law Firms Were Upfront About Who Their Salaried Partners Are
- 5Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250