General Counsel Should Be Asking How Origination Credit is Awarded
"One of the things that corporate clients can do is say that they want to understand that [the origination credit]," Aviva Will, co-chief operating officer at Burford Capital in New York, said. "Is it the woman who was actually doing the work on it, or is it the relationship partner who doesn't actually do my work?"
May 21, 2020 at 10:44 AM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
In-house leaders still view law firm origination credit as a stumbling block to achieving gender diversity in law firms and should begin asking the firms they work with about their origination credit process, according to Burford Capital's 2020 Equity Project Study: General Counsel and the Gender Gap in the Law.
Of the general counsel and senior in-house attorneys who responded to the study, 52% said they are not aware of how origination credit is awarded at the law firms they work with. Aviva Will, co-chief operating officer at Burford Capital in New York, said that number surprised her.
Even if a corporation has a policy about an origination credit, it can be a mystery how that credit is awarded on the law firm side. It is important for in-house attorneys to dig in and ask for that information, Will said.
"One of the things that corporate clients can do is say that they want to understand that [the origination credit]," Will said. "Is it the woman who was actually doing the work on it, or is it the relationship partner who doesn't actually do my work?"
Roughly 36% of general counsel and senior in-house lawyers who responded believe that in order to improve gender equity, law firms should improve how they handle origination credit and business development, the study states.
"You have to follow the money. Lawyers cannot succeed in a law firm unless they receive origination credit. If you are not asking this question as a client, you are not helping," an anonymous assistant general counsel for a Fortune 100 energy company said in the study.
Outside of asking how the credit is awarded, in-house counsel can act as mentors to women who are working at law firms. Will, who previously served as assistant general counsel at Time Warner Inc., said the legal department would help cultivate women partners at the firms they worked with. They wanted those attorneys to better understand the business and become the "go-to" partner.
"It pays off in spades for the partner and for the client because they really get to know the business and become trusted advisers, not just litigators on a particular case," Will said.
Those interviewed for the report indicated that working from home during the pandemic provides an opportunity for women to show their firms and clients how reliable they can be.
"I think staying at home has created an environment where there will be long-term changes in the way that law firms behave and the way that clients work with them and that could be to the benefit of women," Will said.
Women working from home while having other responsibilities shows law firms and clients that they can be efficient from wherever they are.
"Women who are juggling after-school activities can work from home and be just as effective as a man sitting at an office who doesn't have other obligations," Will said.
The study was the result of a series of interviews with over 75 general counsel, heads of litigation and other senior in-house lawyers at global companies with median revenues of $8 billion.
Read More:
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllAfter Miami Arrest, Top Real Estate Broker Brothers Facing Sex Crimes Charges
Attorneys, Professors Share Support for Chancellor Following Musk's Online Attacks
4 minute readVisa CLO-Turned-Vice Chair Seeing Payoff From Expanded Role
Trending Stories
- 1Ruling Provides Lessons for Investors: Mind Your Business (Affairs)!
- 2With SDNY Stay Lifted, Sex Trafficking Civil Suit Against Vince McMahon, WWE Gets Green Light
- 3Insurer Has No Duty to Defend 'Laidlow' Claims, NJ Supreme Court Says
- 4The Marble Palace Blog: The Supreme Court’s Bond With Baseball
- 5Meet the Big Law Partners Advising Political Appointees
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250