What Reopening Law Offices in Milan Looks Like
Social distancing floor markings and lift restrictions are just some of the actions being adopted by Italy's top law firms.
May 18, 2020 at 05:50 AM
3 minute read
Markings on the floor, mandatory masks and only one person in an elevator at a time. These are some of the measures being used by Italy's top law firms as lawyers begin to return to the office following the pandemic lockdown.
The strict measures offer a glimpse into what life could be like in other major legal markets, such as London, once COVID-19 lockdown restrictions are eased.
Several top firms' Milan bases began lifting restrictions and reopening offices on a limited basis at the beginning of May although remote working is still being recommended. But those who are traveling in are finding a very different environment to the one they left.
Leading Italian firm BonelliErede is paying for staff who wish to travel into the office to use taxis or other private transportation, according to two partners at the firm.
Another Bonelli partner told Law.com International that wearing masks is mandatory for staff other than in single occupancy rooms, with masks being provided at the entrance. The firm is providing everyone with two reusable masks, plus two disposable masks daily.
Bonelli's Milan office has placed distancing markings in proximity of the entrance, near lifts and water dispensers.
"We have implemented a very strict safety protocol", a partner said, "all common areas are closed and there is only one person at a time in lifts".
"Common areas are sanitized every two hours", another partner added, describing law firms as behaving "even more prudently than the government".
A partner who has returned to Bird & Bird's Milan office said the firm has divided its lawyers into two teams who never meet, with one team going in two days of the week and another going in for the remaining three days, before switching the following week.
The U.K.-headquartered firm has additionally restricted the number of people in communal areas, with only one person allowed in shared kitchens at a time.
"It's a question of social responsibility. We shouldn't be going around the city when we have remote working capabilities."
The partner also said that they personally do not wear their mask when in their own room, but in more shared spaces such as lifts, they remain vigilant in keeping it on.
"For me it is quite important to come to the office as I have plenty of things to do here", they continued.
Yet, some Italian lawyers are in no rush to return to the office, with just 64 out of Bonelli's 550 staff accessing its Milan office in its first week of opening.
"It's a question of social responsibility", said one partner. "We shouldn't be going around the city when we have remote working capabilities. There are people who need to go to work more than we do".
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHow Many Legal Jobs Will Be Affected by AI? Law Firms Can't Agree
DLA Piper Names Corporate Lawyer Gerry Williams as Co-US Managing Partner
3 minute readLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1The Law Firm Disrupted: Playing the Talent Game to Win
- 2GlaxoSmithKline Settles Most Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2B
- 3BD Settles Thousands of Bard Hernia Mesh Lawsuits
- 4Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 5Inside Track: Late-Career In-House Leaders Offer Words to Live by
Who Got The Work
Nicholas M. DePalma and Christian R. Schreiber of Venable have stepped in to represent CP Management Services, CRS RB4 Holdings and other defendants in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The suit was filed Aug. 30 in Virginia Eastern District Court by Greenberg Traurig on behalf of Daito Kentaku USA. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Claude M. Hilton, is 1:24-cv-01538, Daito Kentaku USA, LLC v. Comstock Partners, LC.
Who Got The Work
Wyatt, Tarrant & Combs partner Andrew J. Pulliam has entered an appearance for Steve Jensen in a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The action, filed Aug. 30 in Tennessee Middle District Court by the Law Office of Perry A. Craft on behalf of Timothy Robins, accuses the defendant of writing a worthless check for over $94,000 for the sale of auctioned goods. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Eli J. Richardson, is 3:24-cv-01064, Robins v. Jensen et al.
Who Got The Work
Lane Powell shareholder Pilar C. French has entered an appearance for Penney OpCo LLC in a pending consumer class action. The complaint, filed Aug. 26 in Oregon District Court by Hattis & Lukacs, alleges that the company markets fictional discounts for certain products. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Mustafa T. Kasubhai, is 6:24-cv-01414, Gamble v. Penney OpCo LLC.
Who Got The Work
Donald L. Carmelite and Coryn D. Hubbert of Marshall Dennehey have stepped in to defend the City of York, Detective Roland Comacho and Detective Lisa Daniels in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint, filed Aug. 27 in Pennsylvania Middle District Court by Levin & Zeiger on behalf of Noel Matos Montalvo, seeks damages for the amount of time that Montalvo was incarcerated over five years for the exonerated killing of his common law wife. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jennifer P. Wilson, is 1:24-cv-01459, Montalvo v. City of York, et al.
Who Got The Work
Joseph M. Englert, Brian E. Pumphrey and M. Laughlin Allen of McGuireWoods have entered appearances for Bank of America NA in a pending class action. The action was filed Aug. 26 in Georgia Northern District Court by Podhurst Orseck; Webb, Klase & Lemond; Crabtree & Auslander; and Morrison + Associates on behalf of the representative of the beneficiaries of the Arthur N. Weinraub Trust, a trust which contains residential real property. The suit accuses the defendant of overcharging the trust by selecting unnecessary and/or excessively priced insurance for the property. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Thomas W. Thrash Jr., is 1:24-cv-03780, Weinraub v. Bank of America, N.A.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250