Davis Polk Doubles Down Against Ex-Associate in Race Bias Suit, Citing 'Deficient' Performance
The firm is asking a federal judge to throw out most of the discrimination claims lodged by a black former associate, Kaloma Cardwell.
May 01, 2020 at 05:46 PM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
Davis Polk & Wardwell is again blasting racial discrimination claims first made by a former associate last year, asking a Manhattan federal judge to dismiss most of the lawyer's lawsuit.
The firm's partial motion to dismiss would jettison claims Kaloma Cardwell brought against six Davis Polk partners, as well as all claims that the brief says are time-barred. The firm is also hoping to persuade U.S. District Judge Gregory Woods of the Southern District of New York that Caldwell's hostile work environment and aiding and abetting claims don't pass muster.
A high-powered lineup from Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison is representing Davis Polk, including Jeh Johnson, a former secretary of Homeland Security under President Barack Obama, as well as Bruce Birenboim and Susanna Buergel. Cardwell has a pair of solo attorneys on his side: David Jeffries, a former Queens prosecutor, and labor and employment lawyer Martin Restituyo.
If Woods grants Davis Polk's Thursday motion in full, the decision would leave in place a small number of claims against the firm and two of its leaders—Thomas Reid, who departed for Comcast last year, and John Bick, a former executive committee member.
"Once again, as our filing makes clear, all of the claims in this lawsuit are meritless. We have moved against those claims that are subject to dismissal at this preliminary stage in the litigation process," the firm said in a statement. "If this lawsuit proceeds beyond this point, we will show that the remaining claims, like those against which we have moved, are flatly contradicted by the facts and that Davis Polk, its management and partners acted entirely properly."
In its filing, Davis Polk reiterated many of the same points it had made to Woods in a Dec. 13 letter—accusing Cardwell of being a poor lawyer who didn't improve his performance despite multiple opportunities to do so.
Cardwell "neglected tasks assigned to him; failed to complete required work and meet deadlines; disappeared for protracted periods when tasks needed to be completed; failed to recognize basic points; reached incorrect conclusions; and advanced positions that would, if carried out, have been contrary to client interests," the firm said in its filing.
"Senior lawyers on plaintiff's matters repeatedly were required to do, or redo, his work, or to find replacement staffing to ensure that deadlines were met and client interests not compromised," Davis Polk added.
A University of California, Berkeley School of Law graduate, Cardwell joined Davis Polk in 2014 as an associate. He was the only black man in his associate class of 120-plus lawyers. He alleged in his lawsuit that he was routinely praised as being a hardworking and competent lawyer by his colleagues but frequently held back. He said he was left off important emails and was repeatedly marked down in his official performance reviews.
"The facts tell an entirely different story. The contemporaneous documentary evidence—performance evaluations, email records, work product—will show uniformly that plaintiff's deficient performance was the only reason he was asked to seek other employment," Davis Polk said in its filing.
Although the law firm argues Cardwell's lawsuit is entirely meritless, it's calling for the dismissal of all claims against six current and former partners—William Chudd, Sophia Hudson, Harold Birnbaum, Daniel Brass, Brian Wolfe and John Butler. Davis Polk asserted that none of Cardwell's claims, such as Birnbaum and Wolfe's failure to email him, "establish any adverse employment action … or the required discriminatory animus."
Cardwell initially sued Davis Polk in November; he filed his first amended complaint in March. According to Davis Polk, Cardwell's amended complaint added an eighth individual defendant, nine new counts, 42 additional pages and 94 new paragraphs.
|Read More
Ex-Davis Polk Associate Alleges Discrimination, Says He Was Repeatedly Sidelined
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHighest-Earning Partners May Be Looking to Cash In on Early Retirement
5 minute readGrayRobinson Opens Office in Pensacola, Marking First New Office Since 2019
3 minute readFrost Enters Arizona Market With Acquisition of Litigation Boutique
Law Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Justices Will Weigh Constitutionality of Law Allowing Terror Victims to Sue PLO
- 2Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
- 3OpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
- 44th Circuit Allows State Felon Voting Ban Challenge to Go Forward
- 5Class Actions Claim Progressive Undervalues Totaled Cars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250