Burford Capital Profits Plunged 21% in 2019
The litigation funder's total income also dipped 15% last year.
April 28, 2020 at 05:37 AM
2 minute read
Burford Capital's operating profits tumbled by 21% in the year ending in December 2019, the litigation funder's latest financial report shows.
The report reveals that the litigation funding giant's operating profits fell by 21% to $279.3 million from $354.8 million over the 12 months of 2019. Its total income also decreased by 15% year-on-year to $356.7 million. The firm said in a statement that both decreases were due to a "lumpy" legal finance market.
At the end of 2019, the firm retained $206 million of cash on hand, compared with $277 million in January 2019, according to the full financial report.
Nevertheless, the firm claims it has seen a 30% year-on-year increase in demand for litigation finance capital and has built a portfolio worth $4.2 billion.
Anticipating a profit dip in realised and unrealised gains, the firm had a tumultuous 2019 after its value plunged by roughly half following the much-publicised short-selling attack by Muddy Waters in August. The attack also prompted a securities class action lawsuit against Burford in New York, which was dismissed in December.
The litigation funder is currently investigating claims of market manipulation and suspicious trading against Muddy Waters.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllCarrier Legal Chief Departs for GC Post at Defense Giant Lockheed Martin
'This Trend Isn't Over': Law Firm Partner De-Equitizations Expected to Continue
Litigation Funder Behind Mastercard Case Says Settlement 'Struck Without Our Agreement'
Trending Stories
- 1Frozen-Potato Producers Face Profiteering Allegations in Surge of Antitrust Class Actions
- 2CooperSurgical Class Action Survives Motion to Dismiss
- 3Lawyers Weigh 'Right to Disconnect' During Remote Work
- 4SEC Commissioner Uyeda Predicts Eased Crypto Enforcement Under Next Chair
- 5How Latham & Watkins Is Using Online Training to Expand the Legal Pipeline
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250