Chase Bank, Ruth's Chris Sued Over COVID-19 Relief Loans
The lawsuit, filed Friday by attorney Jay Edelson, comes one day after Ruth's Chris announced that it would return $20 million received through the Paycheck Protection Program, the $349 billion COVID-19 loan program for small businesses.
April 24, 2020 at 07:47 PM
4 minute read
JPMorgan Chase Bank and two of its largest clients, Ruth's Chris and Phunware Inc., face allegations in a new class action that they profited off the $349 billion loan program for COVID-19 relief by shutting out small businesses.
The lawsuit, filed Friday by Chicago plaintiffs attorney Jay Edelson, names all three companies and comes one day after Ruth's Chris announced that it would return $20 million received through the Paycheck Protection Program, part of the $2 trillion COVID-19 stimulus package passed last month.
"As the federal government was ramping up to allow small businesses to apply for PPP loans, Chase decided to ensure that its favored clients would be provided special assistance to make sure their loan applications were submitted quickly, accurately, and without a hitch," said the complaint, filed by Sha-Poppin Gourmet Popcorn, a gourmet popcorn distributor. "Everyone else, meanwhile, would have to try to submit an application through a non-functional web portal—or look elsewhere."
Sha-Poppin said it ended up getting a $6,000 loan from a smaller bank after struggling to apply for a $19,000 one from Chase.
A Ruth's Chris representative declined to comment about the lawsuit. On Thursday, Ruth's Chris, based in Winter Park, Florida, agreed to return $20 million it received through the program. Other companies, like Shake Shack, made similar moves following a growing backlash from small businesses.
"We were eligible for this assistance, and our goal was to utilize funds to keep as many of our team members working for as long as possible, cover 100% of healthcare benefits, and position Ruth's Chris to rebuild its workforce as quickly as possible," wrote Cheryl Henry, CEO of parent company Ruth's Hospitality Group, in an emailed statement. "We intended to repay this loan in adherence with government guidelines. As we learned more about the funding limitations of the program and the unintended impact, we have decided to accelerate that repayment. We remain dedicated to protecting our hardworking team. It is our hope that these funds are loaned to another company to protect their employees, just as we intended."
Representatives from JPMorgan and Austin, Texas-based Phunware, a mobile application development platform that, according to the lawsuit, received $3 million from President Donald Trump's reelection campaign in 2019, did not respond to requests for comment.
The suit by Edelson, of Edelson PC, is the latest to target the Paycheck Protection Program, part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act. The program, designed to fund more than two months of payroll expenses to small businesses, ran out of money April 16, less than two weeks after it launched, according to the Small Business Administration. Congress anticipates adding another $310 billion to the fund, but critics contend that banks and public companies have taken advantage of the program by edging out small-business applicants.
Class actions filed Sunday alleged that JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo & Co., Bank of America and U.S. Bank prioritized larger loan applicants in order to generate $6 billion in origination fees. The suits cited SBA statistics revealing that, through April 13, 15% of the loans processed were for those seeking the smallest loan amounts of less than $150,000. However, in the final days of the program, through April 16, those loans amounted to more than 17%, showing the banks reshuffled the application process to leave small businesses the last to receive funding.
Friday's suit cites similar statistics. It also notes that Phunware, which appointed former JPMorgan Chase executive Blythe Masters to the head of its board after Congress passed the Paycheck Protection Program, got the "white glove treatment" from Chase, which approved its $3 million loan within days.
The lawsuit noted that Ruth's Chris returned $20 million, but, it says, "the damage was done."
"Hundreds of small businesses like and including plaintiff missed an opportunity to receive their maximum potential PPP loans in a timely manner due to Ruth's Chris's (and Chase's) actions, and there is no guarantee they ever will," the suit says. "Ruth's Chris's walk-back cannot undo the lost opportunities, lost time value of money, and unnecessary stress incurred by these small businesses and their owners."
Sign up for Law.com's Legal Radar to keep up with the latest news and lawsuits in a free, personalized news feed. Track new federal litigation by industry, practice area, law firm, company and region.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllFrozen-Potato Producers Face Profiteering Allegations in Surge of Antitrust Class Actions
3 minute readState Appellate Court Upholds $149M Punitive Damages Award Against Hyatt
4 minute readThe Defense Bar Is Feeling the Strain: Busy Med Mal Trial Schedules Might Be Phila.'s 'New Normal'
7 minute read'New Circumstances': Winston & Strawn Seek Expedited Relief in NASCAR Antitrust Lawsuit
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Justices Will Weigh Constitutionality of Law Allowing Terror Victims to Sue PLO
- 2Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
- 3OpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
- 44th Circuit Allows State Felon Voting Ban Challenge to Go Forward
- 5Class Actions Claim Progressive Undervalues Totaled Cars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250