The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit’s ruling that the House can’t sue to compel former White House counsel Donald McGahn’s testimony is raising questions for both Capitol Hill and federal judges about the immediate effect it has on lawmakers’s ability to go to court.

Those issues were underscored Thursday as a federal judge weighed how the ruling applies to a separate House lawsuit seeking President Donald Trump’s federal tax returns. U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden of the District of Columbia said the McGahn opinion—if it stands—has likely cancelled out the House’s arguments in relation to its subpoena on the tax returns.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]