Critical Mass: After Guilty Verdict, Will Harvey Weinstein Settle With Class of Accusers? Damages in Kobe Bryant Suit Could Include 'Loss of Love.'
What does the jury's verdict in the Harvey Weinstein criminal trial mean for a related class action against the ex-Hollywood producer?
February 26, 2020 at 12:56 PM
7 minute read
Welcome to Critical Mass, Law.com's weekly briefing for class action and mass tort attorneys. What does the jury's verdict in the Harvey Weinstein criminal trial mean for a related class action against the ex-Hollywood producer? How the lawsuit over Kobe Bryant's death could hinge on a "loss of love" claim. Two lead lawyers who won a $265 million verdict over Monsanto's dicamba herbicide share a lot more than the same office.
Feel free to reach out to me with your input. You can email me at [email protected], or follow me on Twitter: @abronstadlaw.

Weinstein Verdict Mirrors Conundrum in Civil Cases
Monday's jury verdict finding Harvey Weinstein guilty of third-degree rape and criminal sexual assault comes as the former Hollywood producer is in negotiations to settle nearly all the civil suits against him, including a class action.
In December, Variety reported that Weinstein had reached a tentative settlement worth $25 million—although, there are some critics of the deal.
I reached out to Elizabeth Fegan (Fegan Scott), who is handling the class action. She would not discuss details of the settlement, including its potential value, but confirmed that both sides could reach a final agreement next month.
She also issued a statement on the Weinstein verdict. Fegan told me the jury's acquittal of two charges that included predatory sexual assault, which involved the same woman, "The Sopranos" actress Annabella Sciorria, might have had less to do with her testimony that Weinstein raped her and more to do with it happening in the 1990s:
"It takes women of trauma who've been traumatized a long time to have the power to use their voice to speak up. We see that issue in civil suits, too, where counts that are older, outside the statute of limitations, were dismissed without any recognition of how rape affects women or how trauma helps them cover up their shame. In my mind, the two not guilty verdicts were not a reflection of the fact the rapes occurred, but more the reflection of our society's and the law's reluctance to recognize that justice should still be served when these acts occurred a long time ago."

Brad Brian of Munger Tolles and Vanessa Bryant
What's in the Lawsuit by Kobe Bryant's Widow?
Vanessa Bryant, the widow of L.A. Lakers basketball star Kobe Bryant filed a wrongful death lawsuit on Monday, the same day of a public memorial following his death in a Jan. 26 helicopter crash.
It took some digging, but here's the lawsuit, filed in LA Superior Court by attorneys Brad Brian and Luis Li (Munger Tolles & Olson) and Gary Robb and Anita Porte Robb (Robb & Robb). The 72-page complaint, brought on behalf of Bryant's estate and his other three children, named two defendants: the estate of the pilot and Island Express Helicopters Inc., which owned the 1991 Sikorsky S-76B helicopter. The suit alleges that Island Express should have known that the Federal Aviation Administration had previously cited the pilot for flying in weather with reduced visibility. It also claims Island Express failed to train its pilots for flying in unsafe weather or install a terrain imaging system in its helicopters.
The crash, which occurred in foggy weather, also killed the pilot and six other passengers, including three children, one of whom was Bryant's 13-year-old daughter, Gianna Bryant.
Victor George (Victor L. George Law Offices), who won a $46 million verdict in 2016, the largest wrongful death verdict involving a minor, called the Bryant lawsuit a simple negligence case. But there could be an "arguably huge loss" because a minor is involved, he said. In such cases, juries must determine how much to award parents for their "loss of love."
"So the jury is asked to determine what is the monetary amount that would compensate the parents for the loss of that child for the rest of the parents' life. You look at how long the parents live, not how long the child would have lived…The jury has to decide what is the reasonable value regarding that loss of love to that parent or parents to never have that child again."

Duo in Dicamba Verdict Aren't Just Partners in Law
This week, I took a closer look at whether a Missouri jury's $265 million verdict against Monsanto over its dicamba herbicide could sprout another legal problem for Bayer, which already is appealing $2.4 billion in Roundup verdicts.
Don Downing (Gray, Ritter & Graham), lead counsel in the multidistrict litigation over Monsanto's dicamba herbicide, said the verdict, which includes $250 million in punitive damages, could help grow the litigation beyond the 100 farmers who have sued so far. Bayer counsel Chris Hohn (Thompson Coburn) called the trial an anomaly because it involved a peach orchard, not soybean fields, which are the focus of most of the lawsuits.
But here's another anomaly: Turns out, the lead plaintiff's lawyer and another top member of the trial team who won the verdict are married to each other. Bev Randles and Bill Randles got married in 2008, then formed their St. Louis firm, Randles & Splittgerber in 2013. Bev said she and her husband are "one of those disgusting couples people get annoyed by because we want to be together all the time."
So how do they make both unions work? Bev told me:
"The way we make it work is everyone respects the other partner's authority—their decision making authority. If it's someone else's arena, we respect that, and we don't blur the lines of personal and professional. Bill and I do a fantastic job of that, because we're both very kind to each other, so it's just something that's easy."
Here's what else is happening:
Opioid Settlement: Generic opioid manufacturer Mallinckrodt reached a potential $1.6 billion deal to settle all the lawsuits against it. The deal, announced on Tuesday, involves thousands of plaintiffs, such as cities and counties, whose claims are pending in the multidistrict litigation over the opioid crisis. The proposal also has the support of 47 attorneys general from states and U.S. territories and is contingent on Mallinckrodt's "specialty generics" subsidiaries emerging from Chapter 11 bankruptcy.
Where There's Smoke: The legal troubles surrounding electronic cigarette maker Juul Labs magnified on Tuesday after 39 states announced an investigation. Connecticut, Texas, Florida, Nevada and Oregon are spearheading the investigation. Pennsylvania sued Juul earlier this month, as did Massachusetts, and New York, Illinois, Minnesota, California and North Carolina have filed lawsuits.
Railroad Ties: Two rail equipment makers agreed to settle class actions brought over "no poach" agreements for nearly $49 million. On Monday, Lieff Cabraser and Fine, Kaplan and Black filed a motion for preliminary approval of the deal, in which Knorr would pay $12 million and Wabtec, $36.95 million. In 2018, the U.S. Department of Justice announced a settlement with the same two companies that barred them from continuing the no-poach practices.
Thanks for reading Critical Mass! I'll be back next week.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLaw Firms Mentioned
Trending Stories
- 1Parties’ Reservation of Rights Defeats Attempt to Enforce Settlement in Principle
- 2ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 3States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 4Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 5Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250