Uber Technologies and its Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher counsel shrugged off claims from shuttered ride-hailing startup Sidecar that Uber surged into new markets and deployed anti-competitive tactics to create a monopoly.

On Tuesday, U.S. District Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero of the Northern District of California granted Uber’s motion to dismiss Sidecar’s amended complaint, which alleged Uber acted as a monopolist to drive Sidecar and other companies out of business.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]