The U.S. Justice Department and lawyers for House Democrats on Monday presented competing views on how quickly a federal appeals could should resolve a dispute over a subpoena seeking the testimony of Donald McGahn, a former Trump White House counsel who has obeyed the president’s command not to speak with congressional investigators.

House Democrats consider McGahn, now a Jones Day partner in Washington, a central witness to allegations that Trump has obstructed Congress and abused his power, the basis of two articles of impeachment the House embraced last week. The Justice Department, meanwhile, suggested that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit refrain from any judgment at all—or at least not while the removal of Trump will be considered.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]