Fifth Circuit Won't Force Judge Off Transgender Woman's Case for Alleged Anti-LGBTQ Bias
A transgender woman claimed Judge Brantley Starr is biased against her based on his involvement in previous litigation and public comments.
December 19, 2019 at 02:59 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
A federal appeals court has refused to remove a trial judge from a transgender woman's case for his alleged anti-LGBTQ bias.
The panel's one-page order gave no explanation for its decision in rejecting a writ of mandamus filed by attorney Scott Palmer on behalf of Valerie Jackson. Jackson, a transgender woman, wanted to force U.S. District Judge Brantley Starr of the Northern District of Texas off her case, claiming he was biased against her.
Starr, a former deputy first assistant state attorney general, refused to recuse Nov. 22, prompting Jackson's writ of mandamus to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The panel was composed of Judges James Dennis, Jennifer Elrod and Stuart Duncan.
Jackson asked the panel to force the judge's removal from her case, claiming Starr is biased against her due to his involvement in a previous Texas lawsuit challenging an Obama administration directive allowing transgender students in public schools to use a bathroom that matches their gender identity. Jackson also claimed Starr participated in a 2015 panel discussion where he defended the right of county clerks to delegate their duties if handling a same-sex marriage that they oppose on religious grounds.
"Given that Judge Starr has fervently fought against equal rights for members of the LGBTQ community, and specifically transgender individuals, a clear bias/prejudice exists against [Jackson]," her petition said.
Jackson's underlying lawsuit alleging her constitutional rights were violated claims Dallas County Jail staff forced her to expose her genitals to confirm her gender after she was arrested and charged with bringing a gun into a prohibited place. Jackson, who is legally identified as a woman on her driver's license, was then placed with the male detainees.
Jackson claimed she forgot to remove a gun from her bag before going to the airport.
Starr is a former clerk for ex-Texas Supreme Court Justice Don Willett, who is now on the Fifth Circuit, and previously worked at King & Spalding. He was confirmed to the bench in July.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSouth Carolina Physicians Challenge Abortion Ban Under Religious Freedom Claims
7th Circ. Revives Transactional Dispute Against Military Retailer, Sends to State Court
4 minute readDOJ, 10 State AGs File Amended Antitrust Complaint Against RealPage and Big Landlords
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1First Department Attorneys Facing Possible Suspension for Failing to Register
- 22024 Marked Growth On Top of Growth for Law Firm Litigation Practices. Is a Cooldown in the Offing for 2025?
- 3Foreclosure: Judicial Estoppel and a Grand Irony
- 4Antitrust Law Continues Its Turn in the Spotlight
- 5Real Property Lawyers Need New Tools
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250