Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan.
What matters isn't the time bar that limits some patent validity challengers, the justices suggest. What matters is whether a patent is valid at the end of the day.
December 09, 2019 at 05:01 PM
1 minute read
The original version of this story was published on National Law Journal
Time bar, shmime bar.
The U.S. Supreme Court sounded ready Monday to rule that U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) decisions on the timeliness of administrative patent validity challenges are not appealable to Article III courts.
Presented by BigVoodoo
Join the industry's top owners, investors, developers, brokers & financiers at THE MULTIFAMILY EVENT OF THE YEAR!
Law firms & in-house legal departments with a presence in the middle east celebrate outstanding achievement within the profession.
The premier educational and networking event for employee benefits brokers and agents.
Atlanta s John Marshall Law School is seeking to hire one or more full-time, visiting Legal WritingInstructors to teach Legal Research, Anal...
Lower Manhattan firm seeks a premises liability litigator (i.e., depositions, SJ motions, and/or trials) with at least 3-6 years of experien...
Join the Mendocino County District Attorney s Office and work in Mendocino County home to redwoods, vineyards and picturesque coastline. ...
MELICK & PORTER, LLP PROMOTES CONNECTICUT PARTNERS HOLLY ROGERS, STEVEN BANKS, and ALEXANDER AHRENS
