Cravath Matches Associate Bonuses After Early Announcement From Milbank
The firm matched Milbank's bonuses, which are identical to those provided last year. First-year associates will be paid $15,000 while senior associates will take home up to $100,000.
November 11, 2019 at 05:05 PM
2 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Cravath, Swaine & Moore announced its associate year-end bonuses on Monday, just a few days after Milbank made its uncharacteristically early associate bonus announcement.
Cravath's bonuses are the same as last year's and are identical to the bonuses Milbank announced last week. First-year associates will be paid $15,000 while senior associates will take home up to $100,000, according to an internal memo obtained by Above the Law, which first reported the Cravath bonuses.
A representative for Cravath said the firm does not comment on compensation matters.
Last year Cravath was the first mover on associate bonuses, announcing them on Nov. 19. But Milbank beat out Cravath when it announced last Thursday. Milbank was also the first to announce a $10,000 associate salary raise last year, which Cravath quickly matched for first-year associates and raised for midlevel and senior associates.
Legal experts speculated that Milbank's early announcement demonstrates just how competitive the market for top talent has become. Announcing early signals to the market that the firm is in good financial health and boosts name recognition among law school students, although many criticized the salary arms race as detrimental to firm profits and clients.
But that trend is likely to continue, Zeughauser Group consultant Kent Zimmermann has said.
"The market for sought-after talent is more competitive than ever and that causes firms to look for an advantage wherever they can find it," Zimmermann told The American Lawyer last week when Milbank announced its bonuses. "I would not be surprised if the date moves up more."
Here is the full bonus scale announced Monday by Cravath:
- Class of 2019 — $15,000
- Class of 2018 — $15,000
- Class of 2017 — $25,000
- Class of 2016 — $50,000
- Class of 2015 — $65,000
- Class of 2014 — $80,000
- Class of 2013 — $90,000
- Class of 2012 — $100,000
- Class of 2011 — $100,000
Similar Stories:
Milbank Becomes First Mover With Early Associate Bonus Announcement
Milbank's Early Associate Bonus Announcement Signals Fierce Competition for Law Firm Talent
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllPenn State Dickinson Law Dean Named President-Elect of Association of American Law Schools
Arizona Board Gives Thumbs Up to KPMG's Bid To Deliver Legal Services
Big Law Practice Leaders Gearing Up for State AG Litigation Under Trump
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Courts Grapple With The Corporate Transparency Act
- 2FTC Chair Lina Khan Sues John Deere Over 'Right to Repair,' Infuriates Successor
- 3‘Facebook’s Descent Into Toxic Masculinity’ Prompts Stanford Professor to Drop Meta as Client
- 4Pa. Superior Court: Sorority's Interview Notes Not Shielded From Discovery in Lawsuit Over Student's Death
- 5Kraken’s Chief Legal Officer Exits, Eyes Role in Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250