Welcome back for another week of What’s Next, where we report on the intersection of law and technology. This week, we question whether encryption is tangled up in the antitrust suspicion surrounding Silicon Valley. Plus, Facebook’s confidential regulatory disclosures might become central to discovery in a proposed class action. And an appellate court rules that the Fourth Amendment does not always apply to WiFi thieves. Let’s chat: Email me at [email protected] and follow me on Twitter at @a_lancaster.


 

Are Anti-Encryption Advocates Capitalizing on Big Tech Backlash?

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]