Ex-Associates Blast Jones Day's Bid to Escape Dad Bias Suit
Mark Savignac and Julia Sheketoff doubled down on their argument that the firm's parental leave policy discriminates against fathers—and that Jones Day knows it.
October 10, 2019 at 07:01 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on The American Lawyer
Photo: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
The married couple who is suing Jones Day for its allegedly discriminatory parental leave policies urged a federal court in Washington, D.C., on Thursday to reject the firm's 37-page motion to dismiss.
In their own 50-page filing, Mark Savignac and Julia Sheketoff argued that Jones Day's parental leave policies violate civil rights laws because birth mothers are offered eight weeks of paid disability leave but not fathers.
"The policy labels the extra eight weeks 'disability leave,' but the label is a sham: Jones Day gives the extra eight weeks to all mothers regardless of disability, simply because they are mothers rather than fathers. It even gives an extra eight weeks to adoptive parents, who incur no disability whatsoever," Savignac and Sheketoff wrote in their opposition to Jones Day's motion to dismiss. The couple are representing themselves in this case.
"As Jones Day's own citations—and other cases that Jones Day does not mention—confirm, that is illegal discrimination on the basis of sex," they added.
Savignac and Sheketoff sued Jones Day in August, alleging that they first complained to the firm about its parental leave policies in 2018 before their son was born. Sheketoff left Jones Day in August 2018. Savignac was fired five months later, after he sent another email seeking 18 weeks of paid leave or else he would sue and fight the issue both in court and the "court of public opinion."
The firm framed Savignac's email as a threat and grounds for termination, although the couple described Jones Day's arguments on retaliation as frivolous: "Defendants' firing of a hardworking associate with a two-week-old baby was a willful violation of those [civil rights] laws."
Neither the firm nor Savignac and Sheketoff, who are representing themselves in the case, immediately responded to requests for comment.
Jones Day is also fighting off a proposed $200 million class action that was filed by former associates who allege that the firm systemically discriminates against women lawyers. On Tuesday, the firm answered the third amended complaint filed by the plaintiffs in that case.
Read More
Ex-SCOTUS Clerks Sue Jones Day, Alleging Anti-Male Bias
Jones Day: Parental Leave Lawsuit by Married Ex-Associates 'Meritless'
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Landlord Must Pay Prevailing Tenants' $21K Attorney Fees in Commercial Lease Dispute, Appellate Court Rules
4 minute read
State Appellate Court Settles Fee Battle Between Former Co-Counsel in Patent Litigation
5 minute read
Return to Work Mandates Among Current Mental Health Stressors for Legal Professionals
1 minute read
Internal GC Hires Rebounded in '24, but Companies Still Drawn to Outside Candidates
4 minute readTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250