A federal appeals court has ordered plaintiffs attorneys and the judge overseeing 2,000 lawsuits over the opioid crisis to respond to the state of Ohio’s request to halt a critical trial next month.

On Wednesday, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit ordered lead plaintiffs attorneys and U.S. District Judge Dan Polster, who is overseeing the multidistrict litigation in the Northern District of Ohio, to respond to Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking to halt the Oct. 21 trial. Yost filed the petition to dismiss or delay the trial, arguing that Summit and Cuyahoga counties, the two plaintiffs, have no legal authority to pursue opioid claims on behalf of the state’s residents.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]