The first federal appeals court to address a growing question over whether the U.S. Supreme Court’s jurisdictional ruling in Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Superior Court of California should apply to class actions heard arguments Wednesday—but it might not come up with the answer.

Lawyers for Whole Foods Market petitioned the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia to address a “novel issue of constitutional due process” created by Bristol-Myers, a 2017 decision that limited the jurisdictions where corporate defendants could be sued in “mass torts,” or cases involving the individual claims of multiple plaintiffs. Defendants across the country have argued that the ruling should apply to class actions.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]