A&O, O'Melveny Quit Merger Talks
The firms have called off talks after 18 months, with some blaming foreign exchange rate volatility.
September 02, 2019 at 08:59 AM
4 minute read
Allen & Overy and O'Melveny & Myers have called an end to their merger talks, Law.com affiliate Legal Week has first confirmed.
The decision to not move forward with talks, almost 18 months after they became public, came amid adverse macro-economic conditions affecting how a deal would be valued, according to two people close to the process.
"Foreign exchange rate volatility and a reduction in U.S. interest rates affect how any deal gets valued," one of the people said. "It made it too difficult to agree a valuation of each firm, and how financial integration and pay would work as a result."
When the talks emerged, £1 bought $1.41, compared with $1.21 today.
Both firms issued statements Monday saying that despite "some compelling synergies between us" they had mutually decided not to continue discussions.
An agreement had been close and some key terms had been agreed by management, including a name and governance structure, according to people with knowledge of the discussions. Both sides had spent the last year thrashing out those details, with meetings held between management and partners in London, Frankfurt and Singapore offices among others.
But questions had been raised by some A&O partners over whether a deal with O'Melveny—code-named 'Orion' within the Magic Circle firm—was the right fit for the firm.
A&O senior and managing partner Wim Dejonghe and Andrew Ballheimer had spent recent months discussing the merger with partners to shore up positive opinion. They had even planned to hold an open partner ballot on the decision, which would have allowed the firm's management to know who had voted in favor of the tie-up or not.
One A&O partner told Legal Week last week: "It's incredibly hard—you have to persuade a material proportion of argumentative partners to move in the same direction. To Wim and Andrew's credit, they've got something which is not a stupid strategic idea, and brought it to a point where they have had had meaningful engagement on it. It's a huge strategic thing and an almost impossible job to persuade everyone—you have so many different interest groups."
The firms said in statements Monday that they had "developed a great deal of mutual respect" for each other and expect to remain in close contact in the service of shared clients.
The A&O statement also said that growing in the U.S. remains "the highest priority" for the firm, stating it will "significantly increase" its focus on lateral individual and team hires. It added that it "remains open to considering opportunities for larger combinations." The firm recently hired a New York finance counsel from Cahill Gordon & Reindel.
O'Melveny added that "the firm's best course is to continue executing on its strategic plan—which has led to an unmatched culture, deep client partnerships, and record financial performances."
Despite those comments, many eyes will now be on each firm's transatlantic strategy.
At A&O, Dejonghe and Ballheimer, and their leadership predecessors, have long been pushing for a U.S. merger, with the pair highlighting the issue as a priority when running for their roles in 2016. Like many of its Magic Circle peers, the firm faces a challenge in competing with a small operation in such a large and developed economy.
At O'Melveny, questions have been raised about the future of its London presence, with several partners and lawyers having left since the merger talks began. Following the exits of partners including a funds trio to Akin Gump, and several other lawyers to outfits including White & Case and Ropes & Gray, O'Melveny operates a stripped down operation in the city. According to the firm's website, the outpost now comprises four partners, six counsel and one associate.
An O'Melveny spokesperson said: "We have a strong London team and are considering strategic lateral and organic growth opportunities there."
Los Angeles-based O'Melveny, which since 2011 has been led by chairman Bradley Butwin, has been exploring a number of growth options in recent years. Legal Week sister publication the New York Law Journal reported late last year that the firm had held preliminary merger discussions with Willkie Farr & Gallagher, but that the discussions never went far. Both firms denied they held merger talks.
Earlier this year, the U.S. firm announced record financial results. Its gross revenue increased by 8.5%, climbing just past the $800 million mark. The firm's revenue per lawyer hit $1.19 million, while a 12.6% increase in profits per equity partner (PEP) brought that figure to $2.26 million.
A&O grew its top line by 5% to hit £1.627 billion ($2 billion) for the 2018-19 financial year, while it raised PEP by 1% to hit £1.66 million.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllHighest-Earning Partners May Be Looking to Cash In on Early Retirement
5 minute readGrayRobinson Opens Office in Pensacola, Marking First New Office Since 2019
3 minute readFrost Enters Arizona Market With Acquisition of Litigation Boutique
Trending Stories
- 1Justices Will Weigh Constitutionality of Law Allowing Terror Victims to Sue PLO
- 2Nevada Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Groundbreaking Contingency Cap Ballot Measure
- 3OpenAI Tells Court It Will Seek to Consolidate Copyright Suits Under MDL
- 44th Circuit Allows State Felon Voting Ban Challenge to Go Forward
- 5Class Actions Claim Progressive Undervalues Totaled Cars
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250