Welcome to Skilled in the Art. I’m Law.com IP reporter Scott Graham. On Monday, the USPTO posed some intriguing questions about artificial intelligence and the patent system and made a formal request for answers. I’ve convened a Skilled in the Art panel of experts to take a quick stab at four of them (with light edits for length and clarity). I’ve also got a couple of amplifications from last week’s briefing. As always, you can email me your thoughts and follow me on Twitter.


From left, John Dragseth, Ryan Abbott and Kathi Vidal

Survey Says: AI Edition

Academics have been debating for awhile whether machines can be inventors for the purposes of patent law. Earlier this month, University of Surrey IP professor Ryan Abbott and others upped the ante, forming the “Artificial Inventor Project” and filing patents around the world that list an AI machine as the inventor.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]