DLA Piper's Ilana Eisenstein Will Co-Lead Penn Law's New Appellate Clinic
Eisenstein, a former federal prosecutor and assistant to the U.S. solicitor general, will share leadership duties with Penn Law professor Jean Galbraith.
August 22, 2019 at 02:55 PM
5 minute read
This fall, nine "brave souls," undeterred by a 7:30 a.m. class start time, will be the first students in the new University of Pennsylvania Law School's appellate advocacy clinic.
The clinic joins a growing community of law school Supreme Court and appellate litigation clinics. But there's a difference, said clinic co-director Ilana Eisenstein, partner and co-chair of DLA Piper's appellate advocacy practice.
"I hope we will have some cases referred to us, that we take on, but the core of the work we hope we will do is adopting issues of importance that may be percolating not just in one case but in many cases in many jurisdictions," Eisenstein (at left) said. "We want to teach the students how do you create an advocacy strategy around key issues."
Eisenstein, a former federal prosecutor and assistant to the U.S. solicitor general, will share leadership duties with Penn Law professor Jean Galbraith, a former clerk to the late Justice John Paul Stevens.
What follows are some thoughts and plans Eisenstein shared about the new venture. The conversation was lightly edited for length and style.
Law.com: How did the idea for the clinic develop?
Eisenstein: Penn Law's been in the [clinic] waters for a long time in different capacities. It had a Supreme Court clinic for many years led by then-professor now-Judge Stephanos Bibas. It also has a longstanding externship for appellate advocacy that is going to continue.
But after Bibas left for the bench, I started talking to the law school about reincarnating it but looking at things through a broader lens, not just limited to the U.S. Supreme Court, but more broadly at appellate dockets in the federal courts of appeals and state appellate courts. From where I sit, the Supreme Court has a limited docket. There is huge competition for those cases among the clinics.
How will you develop a "broader lens?"
We are looking at working with existing and well-established legal advocacy organizations, both local and national, already tackling these issues. We don't need to recreate the wheel. These organizations don't have bandwidth to deal with all of these issues they face. We have a few lined up that we're excited about.
Some of our initial cases—we have a case on an immigration matter, some are focused on the criminal justice system, for example, bail and fees-and-costs issues being litigated in Pennsylvania, and criminal procedure cases as well.
But from a subject matter standpoint, we're not going to be limited in any particular respect. We're looking for issues and great partnerships we can engage on.
How large will the clinic be?
We're starting small. We have nine signed up. Particularly because of my schedule, we start at 7:30 a.m., and a few brave souls were willing to do so. We wanted to start small since this was our first year. I anticipate it will remain a seminar class. It's very hands on in terms of writing and developing cases. Both professor Galbraith and I will be focused on how to litigate these cases and issues.
What role, if any, will your law firm play?
We plan on working the cases with DLA Piper. They will all be pro bono matters. We'll look at these cases like the other pro bono cases we very frequently take on. It also will help support the cases outside of the school year because litigation goes on. From DLA's end, the firm will be part of the case continuity to keep them moving forward irrespective of the school year or vacation schedule.
The firm has been very supportive. We have a lot of our partners teaching as adjuncts in academic settings. We're all excited about this clinic.
At the same time, you are building an appellate practice at DLAPiper. How is it going?
I spent 12 years at the Department of Justice. I was a prosecutor for eight years and four years at the solicitor general's office. I was ready to move back home to Philadelphia. I was ready to have a broader range of clients. There's a lot of pride in representing the government and the United States. I've been very happy at DLA and building this appellate practice.
We already had some great colleagues and we brought on some new ones. There's a lot of need and desire for lawyers with appellate advocacy skills. Part of our thinking at the appellate clinic is the way I work in private practice. I'm not limited to courts of appeals; a lot of it is at the trial level. It's been busy.
Do you hope to return to the Supreme Court lectern, or do you miss those arguments?
I hope we'll have cases that land back there. Whatever forum, there's always opportunity for advocacy. I haven't wanted for chances at the podium. I am pretty regularly filing petitions and amicus briefs. I wouldn't rule that out. Frankly, it's not something I single-mindedly pursue. There are advocates that spend time trying to find those cases. That's not me.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLawyers, Law Groups Oppose Proposal to Require Court Approval for Amicus Briefs
Uvalde Shooting 'Fresh in Everyone's Mind:' Lone Dissenting Judge Disagrees with School's Disciplinary Decision Over Pellet Gun
9th Circuit Judges Weigh if Section 230 Shields Grindr From Defective Design Claims
Trending Stories
- 1'No Finer Work': New York City Council Confirms Next Corporation Counsel
- 2Here’s What Litigators Want For Christmas
- 3Reported Refusal to Officiate Gay Wedding Prompts Review by NY Judicial Misconduct Watchdog
- 4Frozen-Potato Producers Face Profiteering Allegations in Surge of Antitrust Class Actions
- 5CooperSurgical Class Action Survives Motion to Dismiss
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250