LAWYERS, STOP MISUSING CAPS! A Case Study on Big-Letter Abuse
David Fine, a partner in K&L Gates in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, sees it this way: "What happens is a few people do it, and other people look at it, and think that's what you are supposed to do. So-and-so filed a 'Motion' with a capital 'M,' seeking to dismiss the 'Complaint,' with a capital 'C.' There's no reason for it."
August 16, 2019 at 10:24 AM
4 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Texas Lawyer
Photo: totallypic/Shutterstock.com
Do lawyers love the shift key? Have a heart for big letters?
Anyone who reads court documents enough might get the impression that attorneys think that grammatical rules, which only call on capital letters for the beginning of sentences and proper nouns, just do not apply to legal prose.
Curious to learn why, we put the question to Twitter, called some legal writing experts and got a volley of responses with insightful reasoning, historical perspectives, strong disapproval and some good puns. It turns out that a good number of counsel hate over-capitalization and may even have personal vendettas to end the practice.
Ross Guberman, president of Legal Writing Pro, wrote in an email that he often sees words like plaintiff, agreement, motion, defendant, federal or state capitalized.
"In public, many lawyers and judges say it's silly to define obvious terms, but in private, they do so anyway," Guberman said. "The habit starts in law school."
Some legal writers postulate that caps-loving is a holdover from history.
"Blame The Framers," tweeted University of Pennsylvania School of Law professor Dave Hoffman.
Mike Medford, partner in Manning, Fulton & Skinner in North Carolina, tweeted a more detailed explanation: "It was common practice as far back as the Constitution, and change comes slow to the formalities of legal expression. It's the same reason that many court filings begin with the archaic formulation 'Now comes the Defendant.'"
Some attorneys do come to uppercase's defense, noting they have some logical purposes in legal writing. Yet even defenders admit caps are overused.
Julie Schrager, counsel and writing coach in Schiff Hardin in Chicago, said she can see the logic of using caps for words such as "plaintiff" and "defendant," which refer to a proper noun. She also embraces referring to "the court" with a capital, as a sign of respect. But she's noticed lawyers using capital letters to emphasize the importance of words, which she thinks should stop.
"I think it's probably pretentious: 'I know what's important, so that's why I'm capitalizing,' " explained Schrager.
Paul Kat, an appellate solo practitioner from San Francisco, tweeted this more bluntly: "It's symptomatic of the unifying principle of bad legal writing—pretending that it's something more abstruse than merely one person trying to persuade another person of something."
Lawyers agree uppercase is useful for defining terms in legal prose, but does it go too far?
Rich Phillips, partner in Thompson & Knight in Dallas, thinks something's wrong.
"A pathological need to define terms in the hope that no one will be confused. See also the phenomenon of unnecessary parenthetical definitions, e.g. XYZ Inc. (hereinafter "XYZ")," he tweeted.
Even David Fine, a small-letter crusader—with a lowercase 'c,' he said—has admitted he's got a vendetta against capitalization abuse. But he is willing to compromise on the use of upfront definitions. That way, he said, a lawyer won't have to keep explaining a definition through a filing.
The problem is that from there, caps can become contagious.
"Lawyers see those 'defined terms' and don't understand it's defined terms. They see weird capitalization. They get to thinking, 'That's just how we do it," explained Fine, a partner in K&L Gates in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. "What happens is a few people do it, and other people look at it, and think that's what you are supposed to do. So-and-so filed a 'Motion' with a capital 'M,' seeking to dismiss the 'Complaint,' with a capital 'C.' There's no reason for it."
Other counsel are joining a call for change.
"Some of us are trying to Change this, but the Law changes slowly by Design," tweeted Matthew Preusch, an attorney with Keller Rohrback in Santa Barbara.
Portland solo practitioner Michael Fuller noted on Twitter, "I refer a few dozen colleagues a year to Typography for Lawyers but the old guard seems resistant to change."
Those who have quit capitalization abuse will never look back, such as Athul Acharya, an attorney at BraunHagey & Borden in San Francisco.
"It's stupid. I am very grateful that when I clerked, we had an intern in chambers who had previously been a journalist for many years. She corrected some of my overcapitalization, explained why, and materially improved my legal writing forever," he tweeted.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View All
Landlord Must Pay Prevailing Tenants' $21K Attorney Fees in Commercial Lease Dispute, Appellate Court Rules
4 minute read
State Appellate Court Settles Fee Battle Between Former Co-Counsel in Patent Litigation
5 minute read
Return to Work Mandates Among Current Mental Health Stressors for Legal Professionals
1 minute read
Internal GC Hires Rebounded in '24, but Companies Still Drawn to Outside Candidates
4 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Parties’ Reservation of Rights Defeats Attempt to Enforce Settlement in Principle
- 2ACC CLO Survey Waves Warning Flags for Boards
- 3States Accuse Trump of Thwarting Court's Funding Restoration Order
- 4Microsoft Becomes Latest Tech Company to Face Claims of Stealing Marketing Commissions From Influencers
- 5Coral Gables Attorney Busted for Stalking Lawyer
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250