Mail Bomber Cesar Sayoc Sentenced to 20 Years in Prison for Domestic Terror Acts
A Manhattan federal judge Monday sentenced convicted mail bomber Cesar Sayoc to 20 years in prison for sending 16 explosive devices to more than a dozen persons, including Democrats, journalists and critics of President Donald Trump.
August 05, 2019 at 04:43 PM
5 minute read
The original version of this story was published on New York Law Journal
A Manhattan federal judge Monday sentenced convicted mail bomber Cesar Sayoc to 20 years in prison for sending 16 explosive devices to more than a dozen persons, including Democrats, journalists and critics of President Donald Trump.
Among those who were set to receive Sayoc’s devices were former President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton, the former presidential candidate and U.S. Secretary of State.
U.S. Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Southern District of New York declined to impose the life sentence that prosecutors sought in the case. Reading his sentence from the bench, Rakoff said it was the “lowest sentence I could reasonably give him.
“In the court’s view, it is no more and no less than he deserves,” Rakoff said.
U.S. Attorney Geoffrey S. Berman, who attended Monday’s sentencing, in a statement that Sayoc had demonstrated “wanton disregard” for the safety of others and said his actions amounted to “domestic terrorism.”
“Cesar Sayoc assembled and mailed explosive devices to high-ranking officials and former elected leaders to incite fear and to terrorize his victims,” Berman said. “Though thankfully no one was hurt by his actions, Sayoc’s domestic terrorism challenged our nation’s cherished tradition of peaceful political discourse.”
Sayoc, who sat quietly at the defense table throughout the proceeding, expressed regret for his actions and began to weep out of relief as the sentence was handed down.
“I am beyond so very sorry for what I did,” he said earlier in the hearing.
Sayoc, 57, was arrested in October, just days after the first of the unexploded mail bombs was discovered at the New York home of George Soros, a hedge fund billionaire and prominent supporter of liberal causes. The following day a package intended for former Secretary of State Clinton in New York was intercepted. Packages sent to actor Robert De Niro; U.S. Sen. Kamala Harris, D-California; and former Vice President Joe Biden, among a number of other individuals, would be discovered.
According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the bombs were packed inside of PVC pipes, along with shards of glass and pool chemicals to inflict maximal damage on anyone in their vicinity. However, the agency said the devices were incorrectly constructed and “would not have functioned as a result of their design.”
Still, an FBI report concluded, the bombs were “capable” of exploding, given the volatile mix of chemicals inside each device.
Sayoc pleaded guilty in March to 65 felony charges, including 16 counts of use of a weapon of mass destruction, which carries with it a maximum sentence of life in prison. As a part of his plea, Sayoc admitted in court that the packages were meant to do substantial harm to whoever opened them.
But just two days later, Sayoc told Rakoff in a letter that he had misspoke while giving his guilty plea and said that he had only intended to intimidate or scare his victims, not to actually harm anyone.
Arguing for a life sentence, prosecutors have rejected that claim and dismissed Sayoc’s statements that the devices were merely hoaxes. According to the government, the fact that the devices were flawed carried “little legal or practical import” when it came to sentencing.
“The defendant’s offenses are exceedingly serious,” prosecutors said last month in a 43-page sentencing memorandum.
“Put simply, the defendant intended to silence, through harm and fear, those with whom he disagreed, and now he must be incapacitated to protect the public and promote respect for the law.”
Sayoc’s lawyers, meanwhile, argued that their client came from a traumatic background, and suffered from “mental health and cognitive limitations,” which were exacerbated by excessive steroid use and his “infatuation” with Trump.
“In Mr. Sayoc’s mind, he was sending a hoax device, and he had no true grasp of the severity of his crimes or the potential ramifications of his actions. Now, nearly a year later, he understands how deeply wrong his actions were, and he is truly sorry for sending these packages,” wrote Ian Marcus Amelkin, an assistant federal defender in the Southern District.
Rakoff, however, dismissed Trump’s impact as a “side issue” and instead focused on Sayoc’s intent and background. in his sentencing decision, Rakoff said the crimes were “by any measure horrendous” but said it was a “conscious choice” not to inflict deadly force on his victims.
Sayoc would be almost 75 years old when he is eligible to be released based on good behavior, Rakoff said. His prison term would be followed by five years of probation.
Read More:
Mail Bomber Sayoc Pleads to 65 Charges for 2018 Domestic Terror Acts
Accused Pipe Bomber Pleads Not Guilty in Manhattan Federal Court
Alleged Pipe Bomber Faces Possible Life Sentence in Pre-Election Mail Attacks
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllSkadden and Steptoe, Defending Amex GBT, Blasts Biden DOJ's Antitrust Lawsuit Over Merger Proposal
4 minute read'Lack of Independence' or 'Tethered to the Law'? Witnesses Speak on Bondi
4 minute readWillkie Farr & Gallagher Drives Legal Challenge for Uber Against State's Rideshare Laws
5 minute readTrending Stories
- 1'A Death Sentence for TikTok'?: Litigators and Experts Weigh Impact of Potential Ban on Creators and Data Privacy
- 2Bribery Case Against Former Lt. Gov. Brian Benjamin Is Dropped
- 3‘Extremely Disturbing’: AI Firms Face Class Action by ‘Taskers’ Exposed to Traumatic Content
- 4State Appeals Court Revives BraunHagey Lawsuit Alleging $4.2M Unlawful Wire to China
- 5Invoking Trump, AG Bonta Reminds Lawyers of Duties to Noncitizens in Plea Dealing
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250