Another Chief Compliance Officer Arrested for Drug Company's Control Failures
James Barclay is the second chief compliance officer to be arrested by federal prosecutors in three months over their companies' illegal opioid sales.
July 22, 2019 at 04:53 PM
3 minute read
The original version of this story was published on Corporate Counsel
After eluding police for five days, former chief compliance officer James Barclay Monday turned himself in to federal authorities to face a felony charge that he helped his Ohio drug company illegally sell millions of dollars' worth of opioids.
Barclay is the second chief compliance officer to be arrested by federal prosecutors in three months over their companies' illegal opioid sales.
In April federal prosecutors brought the first-of-its-kind opioid distribution case against a drug company, Rochester Drug Co-Operative based in New York, and its executives. The execs included former chief compliance officer William Pietruszewski, who pleaded guilty and is cooperating with authorities.
In the Ohio case, Barclay made an initial appearance in U.S. District Court in Cincinnati Monday afternoon and was released on his own recognizance. He is scheduled to be arraigned July 31 on one count of conspiracy to distribute and dispense a controlled substance, a court spokesman told Corporate Counsel.
Barclay was indicted on July 17 along with his company, Miami-Luken Inc., its former president and two owner-operators of small pharmacies. The other three defendants were arrested then, but Barclay could not be found. U.S. Attorney Benjamin Glassman urged him to surrender, which he eventually did on Monday.
There was no attorney immediately listed in court documents for Barclay, who could not be reached for comment. The crime is punishable by up to 20 years in prison.
In a press conference Glassman, when asked about the executives being charged, said, “I believe it is incumbent on us to ensure that justice is done whether that person is dealing [drugs] at the street level or enabling it in the boardroom. If someone is criminally responsible, then they should be prosecuted and held accountable.”
The indictment states that between January 2008 and December 2015, Barclay and the other defendants and unnamed co-conspirators conspired “to knowingly and intentionally distribute and dispense … controlled substances outside the scope of professional practice and not for a legitimate medical purpose.”
It states that Miami-Luken, located in Springboro, Ohio, a rural town near Dayton, made some $173 million in sales per year. The company, facing millions of dollars in civil lawsuits, went out of business in January.
The indictment says Barclay and the others allegedly “failed to maintain effective controls against diversion of controlled substances, failed to report suspicious orders to the [U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency] and continued to ship the dangerous addictive drugs to pharmacies in rural Appalachia where the opioid epidemic was at its peak,” even after being warned about suspicious orders by federal agents.
For example, according to the indictment, Barclay and Miami-Luken ignored obvious red flags by distributing more than 2.3 million oxycodone pills and 2.6 million hydrocodone pills to a small pharmacy in Ocean, West Virginia, a town of only 1,394 people.
The indictment states that Barclay and his co-conspirators sought to “unlawfully enrich themselves by: (1) profiting from the unlawful distribution and dispensation of controlled substances; (2) distributing and dispensing large amounts of opioids to known pill mills; and (3) facilitating the diversion of oxycodone and hydrocodone, Schedule II and III controlled substances, for illicit use.”
It also says that Barclay and Miami-Luken “failed to maintain effective controls against diversion, and failed to exercise due care in confirming the legitimacy of all orders.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllLife Sciences M&A Set to Boom, Litigation to Remain Steady Under New Trump Admin
5 minute readPharmacies Accuse GoodRx of 'Inviting Price-Fixing' in Series of Antitrust Class Actions
4 minute readSage Therapeutics Axes GC After Drug-Pipeline Failures Force Cost-Cutting
Trending Stories
- 1Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-58
- 2Sweet James Clinches $17.4M Personal Injury Jury Verdict in California's Kings County
- 3In Lame-Duck Session, US Senate Confirms Illinois Federal Judge on Bipartisan Vote
- 4Gordon Rees Opens 80th Office, ‘Collaboration Hub’ in Palo Alto
- 5The White Stripes Drop Copyright Claim Against Trump Campaign
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250