Welcome back to Higher Law, our weekly briefing on all things cannabis. I’m Cheryl Miller, reporting for Law.com from Sacramento. Weren’t you all supposed to be on vacation last week for the Fourth of July holiday? It doesn’t seem like you were given all the marijuana-related news happening.

This week we’ve got a recap of the brief bipartisan agreement on marijuana laws at a congressional hearing. Plus, the Ninth Circuit dived into the state-federal conflict on cannabis legality, again. A Canadian cannabis company is in trouble with federal regulators–and plaintiffs lawyers. And a Florida appellate court says no to the Sunshine State’s vertical integration model for marijuana.

This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.

To view this content, please continue to their sites.

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law are third party online distributors of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law customers are able to access and use ALM's content, including content from the National Law Journal, The American Lawyer, Legaltech News, The New York Law Journal, and Corporate Counsel, as well as other sources of legal information.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at [email protected]